Dear friends,

Mumbai CAT court in its order clearly states that,

The respondents themselves directing the applicants to officiate in the posts of JTO after they had qualified in the Screen Test and after undertaking first phase training, they have been officiating in the said post of JTO for more than ten years, for rendering substantial justice, the respondent are required to take judicious decision to decide the fate of these applicants who may be left out after exhausting 35% quota posts for the year1999. And directing the respondents to re-asses the vacancy position in the respect of 35& quota for the year 2000-2001 and accommodate these applicants against those vacancies for the year 2000-2001 for the regular posting as JTO within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

On this background provisions of JTO RR 2014 are arbitrary.

Decision to impose First Phase Training again seems to be circumventing court judgment which would be brought to the notice of the court at appropriate time.

We appeal all officiating JTO’s to send representation against the provisions of JTO RR-2014, to CMD BSNL and register our protest before honorable CMD BSNL.(copy is available on the blog) We hope for positive correct actions from the Management to avoid further litigation in the matter.

Instead of ABG Consultants Advocate of Mumbai, we decided to get the services of the Chandigarh High court Advocate for proposed Perjury case against the applicants of Civil writ petition No 5608 of 2007 in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana.

We had preliminary telephonic talks with Advocate, he advised to send the relevant documents and rough draft prepared by Mumbai CAT Advocate who will also assist the Chandigarh Advocate during the proceedings of the case. Battle against our junior colleagues seems to be unavoidable.