Sunday 30 March 2014

Dear friends

Our court case Rejoinder is ready for submission to Mumbai CAT.

We will submit Rejoinder on 1st April 2014.

Tuesday 25 March 2014

Dear friends MHT circle issued Officiating JTO order upto 4th July 2014.


WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH OUR ADVOCATE REGARDING
IMPLEMENTATION OF FR-22 (1) (a) (i) ORDER.

ORDER IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO APPLICANTS AND MEMBERS OF
BSNL  OFFICERS  ASSOCIATION.

WE NEED TO FILE SEPERATE APLLICATION IN
MUMBAI CAT FOR IMPLIMENTATION TO ALL IN MHT CIRCLE.

Monday 24 March 2014


Dear friends,

MHT Circle issued Officiating JTO order till Next date of Mumbai CAT Court case hearing  23rd  April 2014.

We have detailed discussions on 23rd March 2014 with our Advocate regarding submission of Rejoinder.

Wednesday 19 March 2014




Dear friends,


Next date of Mumbai CAT  Court case hearing  23rd  April 2014.


We will submit Rejoinder in the next week.







Friday 14 March 2014

Dear friends,

              Finally BSNL Management field reply in Mumbai CAT on 13th March 2014.
Copy of reply is also given to our Advocate. Details of reply will be inform shortly.
Now we have to submitt Rejoinder within two weeks.

Mumbai CAT court case hearing, and our meeting on 19th March 2014 is postpond.
The next date of hearing will be declare on 18th March 2014.

Tuesday 11 March 2014

Request letter to Chief Information Commissionar New Delhi

                                                From:   Mr. S.W.PARNERKAR    .
                                                              Shreesakshi Row House No. 4, Behind Bank of                                                                                Maharashtra, Gandharva Nagari, Indira Nagar,
                                                              Nashik- 422009.   Maharashtra.
                                                              


To,
Chief Information Commissioner,
New Delhi-110067.                                          
Kind Attention to
Dy. Registrar ( Central Registry)

            Sub: Request for early disposal of my second appeal.
        Resubmitted on dt. 25/09/2013, after removing deficiency.

            Ref: Dairy No. 155641 Dtd. 21/08/2013.

            Respected Sir,
           
With reference to above Dairy no. 155641 Dtd. 21/08/2013 received by me
On  17th Sept.  2013. I am resubmitted the appeal after removing the deficiencies within three weeks on 25/09/2013.
I would like to request your honour to kindly dispose off my appeal at early date directing the CPIO & First appellate Authority to provide the information sought and obliged.
The delay may cause undue hardship to the 1800 employees of BSNL including myself.
                          
            Thanking you,

In anticipation of early favourable action pl.


                                                                     
 Yours faithfully,




                                                                              Mr. S.W.PARNERKAR            .
                                                             


Copy to: 1) FAAuthority. Mr. G.K.Upadhyay Chief General Manager BSNL Haryana       
                                                                                     Circle, Ambala- 133001.




4) Date of RTI   Application  &             RTI application  Dt.  02/04/2013.Enclosed
                                                                                                               As Annexure I                                                                                                                                                                                       
    Date of First Appeal                            Dt . 13/05/2013. Enclosed as Annexure III

5) Particulars   of   decision of CPIO     Letter no. Staff/RTI/HR/13-14/S.W.Parnerkar    
                                                           /4.  dtd.  27/04/13. Enclosed as          Annexure II

    & First Appellate Authority               Letter no. Staff/RTI/HR/13-14/04- 4/Appeal/
                                                             S.W/6.  Dtd  25/06/13  Enclosed as AnnexureIV

6) Date of receipt of reply by
     Applicant from CPIO    &                    Dt. 01/05/2013.  
    First Appellate Authority                      Dt. 01/07/2013.

7) Details of information sought.
 
   Information required
a)      Copy of affidavits in reply field in the civil rite petition no. 5608 of 2007. Before Hon’ble. High court for the states of Punjab & Haryana. by the respondent.
b)      In  the civil rite petition no. 5608 of 2007. In the   High court for the states of Punjab & Haryana at Punjab in the case Dalbir Sing & others petitioners Vs. BSNL Ltd. & others. After the judgement on 30th May 2008, the advice / opinion / Instructions / Guidelines given by,
i)                    BSNL Council
ii)                  BSNL Corporate Office legal wings correspondence with CGMT Haryana to be provided.
c)      Copy of Note sheet & the correspondence with reference to the communication referred above made with Corporate Office..
Copy of Note sheets for letter & all correspondence culminated the decision for implementing the court order of High Court Punjab & Haryana without filing SLP in Supreme Court.

8) Brief facts of the case

            A Civil Writ petition was filed by 8 Telecom Technical Assistants (TTA’s) of BSNL Haryana Circle at Punjab & Haryana High Court.
The outcome of the case has affected the promotion of about 2500 senior TTA’s all over India including the applicant, due to the suspected mishandling of the case by the CGMT Haryana BSNL hence the information were sought.

9) Reason Grounds for this appeal
     The information sought was refused by the CPIO & First Appellate Authority under section 8(1) (h) of the RTI Act.2005 and also stated that the disclosure will not be in the interest of BSNL/ Dept. as case is pending and it is subjudice.
            Reason given for refusal of information is not tenable as there is no investigation or apprehension of prosecution of offender is involved in this court case, hence Section 8(1)(h) of RTI Act 2005 cannot be invoked. Also merely by providing this information, there is no act of subjudice committed by CPIO & First Appellative Authority.

Prayer / Relief sought

            The Honourable Chief Information Commissioner be pleased to direct the CPIO to provide the information sought.

Declaration
            I hereby by state, the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously field with this commission, nor is pending with any court or tribunal or authority.

            Thanking you,
                                                                                    Yours faithfully,


                                                                                    S.W. PARNERKAR

Tuesday 4 March 2014



Dear friends,


Next date of Mumbai CAT Court case is 19th March 2014.


We are planning to arrange the meeting of all officiating JTO’s on


 19th March 2014, at Mumbai.

Monday 3 March 2014


Reply from Advocate N. B. Sood & Associates regarding

CWP 5608 /2007 High Court of Punjab and Haryana

 

 

We gone through the papers send by you and discussion between us on 25th Feb 2014 during our Mumbai visit, we think that,

As there is a documentary evidence of Wrong information, may be Fraudulent submitted to the court during case by all applicants.

There is possibility of involvement or negligence on the part of Top Management of Haryana BSNL as well as Directorate HR New Delhi BSNL.

The decision of High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the case CWP 5608 /2007 directly can not be challenged due to technical lapses but, an application can be moved in Supreme Court New Delhi for an order to BSNL Management for Inquiry in to the matter related with case CWP 5608 /2007 of High Court of Punjab and Haryana on the grounds that

Misuse of judiciary for personal benefits.

Possibility of criminal conspiracy etc,

Along with all concerned,   Ministry of Defense could also be the party to the case as some of the applicants are Ex-servicemen and it seems that they have claim their service experience including services period of Defense Department.

 

For

 Advocate N.B. Sood & Associates.