To,                                                                                                          Date : 28^th JUly 2015

The Sr. GM HR/Admn Cum CPIO,

O/o Chief General Manager Punjab & Haryana Circle

AMBALA

           

Sub: Providing information under RTi Act 2005. Reg.

Respected sir,

Kindly provide me the following required information by post. (I am ready to pay extra if     charges are more).

1) Name & Address of Applicant:    Mr. S.W.PARNERKAR                                                                             . .                                                                Shreesakshi Row House No. 4, Behind Bank of                                                                                                                                                                           Maharashtra, Gandharva  Nagari, Indira Nagar,

                                                                                         Nashik- 422009.   Maharashtra.

                                                                                   Tele. No. Resi.0253-2320202, Mo. 9423969789   

             

  2) Name & Address of CPIO                Sr. G.M.(HR/Admn) Cum CPIO

                                                                                         O/o CGMT BSNL  Haryana Circle, Ambala -133001.

     

Details of Information required:

      Names, present Post and Station of posting of the following Authorities of CGMT Punjab & Haryana Circle, who were in charge during the period 1^st January 2007 to 31^st December 2008. If any of the Officers retired from the services, Date, Post & Station of Posting at the time of his retirement may please be provided.

1)      Chief General Manager Punjab & Haryana Circle

2)      D.G.M Admin. Punjab & Haryana Circle

3)      A.G.M. Admin. Punjab & Haryana Circle

4)      S.D.E. Legal, Punjab & Haryana Circle     

The above information may kindly be made available at the earliest possible.

Declaration

                I hereby by state, the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously field with this commission, nor is pending with any court or tribunal or authority.

Thanking You in Anticipation,

                                                                                                                                       Yours sincerely,

                                                                                                                                       S.W. PARNERKAR.

Shree sakshi  Row House No.4,  B/h Bank of Maharashtra,  Gandgarva  Nagari, Indira Nagar, Nashik- 422009. Maharashtra.    Mobile No. 9423969789.  LL No. 0253-2320202.

Dear friends,

Mumbai CAT Court case is heard on 24th July 2015, before Hobl. Judges Smt. Mujumdar & Smt. Bhamsi arguments of both the parties heard by the court.

AGM Staff and other three officers of Legal Section of CGMT MHT Circle also attended case hearing as per Court order.

It was a very painful and shocking experience. BSNL Advocate in consultation with present BSNL Authorities tried to submit misleading and illegal information about case before the court.

But fortunately our Advocate not only succeeded in producing factual information, but also firmly produced information about similar attempt of BSNL Administration during the Civil Writ Petition No.5608 of 2007 In the Punjab & Haryana High Court with documentary evidence.

Due to the contradictory information’s from the both Advocates, court ordered to both Advocates to produce written submission within one week’s time. Case will again examine on 14^th August 2015.

BSNL Officers present for court case hearing submitted some documents to the court, besides our several requests and their bound duty arrogantly refuse to give the copies of papers submitted to our Advocate.

Considering the act of BSNL officers we may submit the complaint to court against CGMT Maharashtra to produce misleading information before the court.

We also met ABG Consultant Advocates regarding filing perjury case. Case will be field as soon as documentation process completed.

The Third Notice of Hearing is served by the Central Information Commissioner, New Delhi on our complaint against CPIO of BSNL CGMT Haryana & CPIO BSNL Corporate Office on 16^th July 2015.

The Online hearing is fixed on 14^th August 2015 through Video Conference at NIC Computer Centre, Collect orate Office Nashik for applicant and,

NIC Studio, mini Secretariat, Ambala City for CPIO of BSNL CGMT Haryana, before Honorable Shri. Basant Seth, Information Commissioner, New Delhi.

Dear friends,

I received the reply from CPIO BSNL Corporate office. The information sought is not provided by the CPIO besides the order of Chief Information Commissioner.

We have submitted the complaint against both CPIO’s on 16^th July 2015.

To,                                                                                            Date 16^th July.2015.

The Chief Information Commissioner,

Club  Building, Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi-110067.                                                    

            Ref: File No. CIC/BS/A/2014/000935/4729 dtd.20April 2015.

Respected Sir,

           

With reference to the above I submit the following for your consideration.

1) Name , Address of Applicant:       Mr. S.W.PARNERKAR    .

                                                             Shreesakshi Row House No. 4, Behind Bank of                                                                                 Maharashtra, Gandharva Nagari, Indira Nagar,

                                                              Nashik-  422009.  Maharashtra.

                                                              Tele.No. Resi.0253-2320202, Mo. 9423969789    

Particulars of Respondent Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) Complained against.

2) Name & Address of CPIO.            Smt. Alpana Agrawal

                                                              G.M.(HR/Admn) Cum CPIO,

O/o CGMT BSNL  Haryana Circle,                   Ambala133001.

3) Date of submission of Application seeking information;    02/04/2013.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

4) Date and order No. passed on my Second Appeal by C.I.C. New Delhi:

    File No. CIC/BS/A/2013/002535/6217 20 OCTOBER 2014.

                         

5) Date of my complaint under Sec.18 (1) (e) of RTI Act 2005    Dt 24^/11/2014

   And reply received from CPIO on.                                         Dt. 18/12/2014.

Application made under Sec. 20 (d) of RTI Act 2005 dtd. 19^th Jan. 2015.

           

            Information sought but not provided despite the direction from Honourable Chief Information Commissioner after the appeal was allowed.

Copy of Note sheets & the correspondence with reference to the communication referred above made with Corporate Office. Received.

Copy of Note sheets for letters & all correspondence culminated in the decision for implementing the court order of High Court Punjab & Haryana without filing SLP in Supreme Court.    Not received in spite  of

Decision Notice, passed by Honourable Chief Information Commissioner

while disposing off the appeal dtd. 19/01/2015.

                       

            The CPIO should forward the relevant part of the appellant’s RTI query to Corporate Office and should ensure that the information is supplied to him within 15 days from the receipt of this order.

                                   

             In compliance of the decision of Honourable Chief Information Commissioner, the CPIO & GM (HR/ADMIN) of Haryana forwarded the papers to, Addl. GM(MIS) & CPIO BSNL Corporate Office New Delhi on 1/05/2015. Requesting CPIO Corporate office to furnish the information directly to the applicant from his end.

            

Despite of the direction of Honourable Chief Information Commissioner that,  “ He should forward the relevant part of the appellant RTI query to corporate office. And should ensure that the information is supplied to him within 15 days”, of receipt of this order.

            

Both the CPIO’s of Haryana Circle & Corporate Office wilfully and deliberately did not provide the information sought as detailed below.

            

             The reply received from CPIO BSNL Corporate office, clearly shows the CPIO chose to forwarded the letter asking for information to a Junior Officer AGM (Estb)-IV though the case was dealt by AGM( Pers)-IV ,and who have find the order No. F.No.3/9/2007/Pers-IV dtd. 11/11/2008 convening the decision of BSNL implementing the decision of High Court of Punjab & Haryana. The act of the CPIO amounts to deny the information sought by simply endorsing the letter of the Junior officer informing “Asked information is not clear to reply under RTI Act 2005.”

            

Further the appellant submit that after reaching second appeal stage and two hearings with Honourable Chief Information Commissioner the direction of CPIO corporate office to appeal to a much junior officer to Hon’ able Chief Information Commissioner tantamount to mockery of the RTI Act 2005 itself.

             The appellant further submit, at the first instant of my application for information the CPIO Haryana Telecom Circle should have transferred the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other public Authority and informed the appellant immediately about transfer as per Sec. 6(2)(ii) of RTI Act 2005, which was deliberately not done by CPIO, Haryana Telecom Circle.

            Further CPIO of Haryana Telecom Circle forwarded the copy of Honourable Chief Information Commissioner decision taken in the second hearing held on 20^th April 2015, enclosing copy of the order issued by corporate office implementing Punjab & Haryana High Court decision About  this letter  only the information was sought by the appellant which includes “the copy of Note Sheets for letter and all correspondence culminated in the decision to implement the court order of Hon arable High Court of Punjab & Haryana without filling SLP in the Supreme Court.”

             Now the appellant submit that in the circumstances  this is a fit case to impose suitable penalty under Sec. 20 of the RTI Act2005 for not providing the ordered information and knowingly giving misleading information , thereby the CPIO s’ obstructed furnishing information.

           

            Thanking you,

                                                                                    Yours faithfully,

                                                                                S.W. PARNERKAR

                                               

                                                         Tele.No. Resi.0253-2320202, Mo. 9423969789   

                                                         Emai Id:  shirishp1964@gmail.com

                                                                         shirishparnerkar@yahoo.com

Enclo: 1) Original RTI application for seeking information; Dtd. 02/04/2013.

Copy to: 1) CPIO Smt. Alpana Agrawal G.M. (HR/ Admn), O/o CGMT BSNL                                  Haryana  Ambala- 133001.

               

                2) Addl. GM (MIS) & CPIO BSNL Corporate Office New Delhi.110001.

Dear friends,

Mumbai CAT Court case is heard on 3rd July 2015, before Hobl. Judges

Smt. Mujumdar & Smt. Rohi.

Contenuous  two hours arguments of both the parties heard by the court.

Case is posted to 24th July 2015, for further discussion on contradictory Judgements of Chandigadh High Court & Chennai High Court.

We also met ABG Consultant Advocates regarding filing purjury case. According to Advocate The draft of Notice of Purjury will be prepared in next week.

We will try to issue the notice before the final hearing of Mumbai CAT court case scheduled on 24^th July 2015.

We appeal all Officiating JTO’s to participate in perjury case.