WISH YOU ALL VERY HAPPY AND PROSPERUS NEW YEAR 2015
Wednesday, 31 December 2014
Thursday, 25 December 2014
Dear friends,
Because of our Complaint to Central Information Commissioner New Delhi against, CPIO O/o CGMT Haryana for providing incomplete Information on our second Appeal under RTI Act2005.
CPIO O/o CGMT Haryana has provided some more important information in 53 pages.
Still some specific information is intentionally not supplied, for which One more Complaint will be submit after legal advice of our Advocate to Central Information Commissioner New Delhi, against CPIO O/o CGMT Haryana for providing incomplete Information.
Our Advocate also advice to file complaint in High Court of Punjab & Haryana against,
8 Applicant TTA’s for producing false information before the court.
Thursday, 11 December 2014
File No. CIC/BS/A/2013/002535/6217
Complaint under Sec. 18 (1) (e) of RTI Act 2005.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To, Date 24th Nov.2014
The Chief Information Commissioner,
Sir
With reference to the above I submit the following for your consederation.
1) Name , Address of Applicant: Mr. S.W.PARNERKAR .
Shreesakshi Row House No. 4, Behind Bank of Maharashtra , Gandharva Nagari, Indira Nagar,
Nashik- 422009. Maharashtra .
Tele.No. Resi.0253-2320202, Mo.
Particulars of Central Public Information Officer( CPIO) Complained against.
2) Name & Address of CPIO. Mr. Kamal Kumar
G.M.(HR/Admn) Cum CPIO,
3) Date of submission of Application seeking information; 02/04/2013.
4) Date and order No passed on my Second Appeal by C.I.C. New Delhi:
File No. CIC/BS/A/2013/002535/6217 20 OCTOBER 2014.
5) Statement of facts:
In compliance with CIC order referred at 4 above CPIO Vide
letter No. Staff/RTI/HR/2013-14/S.W. Parnerkar /14 Dtd 31/10/2014 provided incomplete information hence this complaint.
The details of incomplete information given below.
Point No.
|
Information sought
|
Information Provided
|
Incomplete due to following reasons
|
1
|
Copy of affidavit in reply field in the civil Writ petition no. 5608 of 2007. Before Hon’ble. High court for the states of Punjab & Haryana. by the respondent
|
Only 15 pages of written statement on Writ Petition C.W.P. 5608 on be half of respondent No 1&2 are given.
|
The Annexures to the written Statement referred there in are not provided hence information provided is incomplete.
|
2
|
(a) In the civil writ petition No. 5608 of 2007. In the High court for the states of Punjab & Haryana at Punjab in the case Dalbir Sing & others petitioners Vs. BSNL Ltd. & others. After the judgement on 30th May 2008, the advice / opinion / Instructions / Guidelines given by,
i) BSNL Council
ii) BSNL Corporate Office legal wings correspondence with CGMT Haryana to be provided.
|
(a)Received Note sheet 1N to 43N regarding the Writ petition.
(b)Correspondence between CGMT & BSNL Corporate Office available in the file at page 4/c,5/c.6/c & 8/c are only provided.
(c) Legal opinion of Advocate Shri Madan Mohan provided
|
Legal opinion given by Sr. counsel Adv. Shri. K.C.Kaushik on 20th Sept.2008 not provided.
Letter received from Corporate office referred in Note sheet 25N, said to be kept as 18/c not provided, hence information is not complete.
Also it is pertinent to state the legal opinion given by Adv. Shri. Madan Mohan on Date25/07/2008 is not legible.
|
3
|
a) Copy of Note sheet & the correspondence with reference to the communication referred above made with Corporate Office..
Copy of Note sheets for letter & all correspondence culminated the decision for implementing the court order of High Court Punjab & Haryana without filing SLP in Supreme Court.
|
No separate information is provided except certain remarks from which it can be inferred that Managing Committee on its 104th Meeting on dt.4/11/2008, has taken certain decision in this matter.
|
Neither the copy of Note sheet nor Letter or correspondence which has culminated in to the decision for implementing the Punjab & Haryana High Court order was provided about the decision taken in the 104th Management Committee Meeting held on 4/11/2008.
Had this information is not available with CPIO. He should have forwarded my application as per RTI Act to the Corporate Office to provide the required information which was deliberately not followed and there by not provided the information. .This amounts to refusal of Information.
|
In view of above, I pray your honour to kindly impose suitable penalty on CPIO as per Section 20 (1) of RTI Act 2005for providing incomplete Information in spite of the orders to provide the information by C.I.C. on my Second Appeal.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
S.W. PARNERKAR
Tele.No. Resi.0253-2320202, Mo.
Emai Id: shirishp1964@gmail.com
shirishparnerkar@yahoo.com
Encl. Copy of the receipt for the Register A.D., for forwarding this complaint to CPIO on dt. 24/11/2014, for their information.
Copy to: 1) CPIO Mr. Kamal Kumar G.M.(HR/Admn), O/o CGMT BSNL Haryana
Ambala- 133001.
Thursday, 4 December 2014
Dear
friends,
Complaint
is submitted to Central Information Commissioner New Delhi, against,
CPIO O/o CGMT Haryana for providing incomplete
Information. And violation of order of ,
Central
Information Commissioner New Delhi on
our second Appeal under RTI Act2005.
Next Date of hearing of Mumbai CAT Court case is 6th Jan. 2015.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)